Agnes, Martyr of Rome 304

Think back to that year before you were officially a “teenager.” What were you doing when you were 12 years old? I think to when I was 12 and remember I was completing my last year of braces, worried about pre-pubescent acne, and getting irritated on a daily basis at how nosey my parents were. I was discovering rock music on the radio and learning to play the flute in band. I was focused on my friends and the fact that I couldn’t tame my curly hair into submission. My life orbited around my needs, my plans, my desires.

We honor and celebrate Agnes, our martyr in Rome in the year 304. This lovely young woman lived in an era of great Christian persecution under the Roman Emperor Diocletian. Under this Emperor as well as others who shared his opinions, Christians were stripped of all rights as citizens, beaten, burned, tortured, and killed for their faith. Continue reading “Agnes, Martyr of Rome 304”

Can You Say That a Bit Slower This Time


Two chapters from Alister McGrath’s Christian Theology: An Introduction focuses on the doctrines of God and of the Trinity.

The first concern addressed is the doctrine of God.  McGrath offers the minor theory that God might not be male and quickly moves forward.  He identifies the “personhood” of God through such philosophers as Tertullian, Spinoza, and Buber.  These offered what God’s love towards man looked like while retaining His omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence (199-203).  McGrath discusses the emotions of God, namely the possibility for God to suffer.  Aquinas and Moltmann provides McGrath’s two examples.  Aquinas: “Mercy is especially to be attributed to God, provided that it is considered as an effect, not as a feeling of suffering” (204).  Conversely, from Moltmann, “a God who cannot suffer is a deficient, not a perfect, God” and “God willed to undergo suffering.  The suffering of God is the direct consequence of the divine decision to suffer and the divine willingness to suffer” (206).  McGrath briefly offers Patripassianism, God suffering with Jesus, and Theopaschitism, “one of the Trinity was crucified” (207); the latter, superficially, implies modalism.  Next, McGrath discusses God’s power through omnipotence, need for self-limitation, and influence and persuasion (209-215).  In this section, McGrath implies the age-old question of “Why bad things happen to good people?” using the theory of process theology (214-215).  McGrath addresses the “goodness” or, conversely, the benign nature of God’s creation and shares theories from Tertullian, Irenaeus, Augustine of Hippo, Barth, and Plantinga (215-227).  He admits that the Holy Spirit deserves a dedicated chapter and yet briefly offers aspects and functions of the Spirit within the life of man (227-233).

Next, McGrath discusses the Trinity and how each part of the Trinity fulfills his nature.  Homoousios and homoiousios are both features of God and Jesus that McGrath identifies (235-236).  McGrath notes, “the proper subject matter of the doctrine of the Trinity is the encounter between divine and human persons in the economy of salvation” (236).  The “hypostasizations…point to a pattern of divine activity and presence in and through creation, in which God is both immanent and transcendent” (239).  McGrath notes the difference between persona of the Trinity from the substantia (240) and discusses two heresies of the Trinity:  modalism and tritheism (244-246).  The Cappadocian fathers discussed the filioque controversy as understanding the relationship and movements of the Spirit and Jesus to God (247-249).  McGrath concludes this chapter by offering perspectives on the Trinity from:  Augustine, Barth, Rahner, Macquarrie, Jenson.  Of note from Rahner, “the way God is revealed and experienced in history corresponds to the way in which God actually is” (254).  In other words, God will not reveal Himself contrary to His nature, and man may discover His nature through history.

Ultimately, Karl Barth best addresses the power, ability, and function of God and the Trinity:  “For revelation to be revelation, God must be capable of effecting self-revelation to sinful humanity, despite their sinfulness” (253).



It’s Tuesday, right?  My mind is a jumbled mess!  Dimensions of theological study.  Sacred theology.  Natural theology.  Spiritual theology.  Philosophical theology.  Nothing moves outside of God = unmoved mover >>> Aristotle.  Recidivism vs. Relativism.  Fukuyama.  Adler.  Barth.  Solzhenitsyn.  Nietzsche.  Aquinas.  Lewis.  Pannenberg.  Jungel.  Plato.  The “mystery” of faith.  Wisdom of God (Truth).  Holiness of God (Good).  Glory of God (Beauty).  Salutis.  Cognoscendi.  Essendi.   Incarnation of the Word.   There is no conversation without mutual acceptance of exaltation.